Bhagwati Saran v Parmeshwari Nandar
Rule established
Interest to take effect on death of life tenant is vested (not contingent) because death is certain
Facts
- Transfer created a life interest in A and remainder to B "on A's death"
- B died before A; B's heirs claimed the remainder
- Question: was B's interest vested (passes to heirs) or contingent (fails on B's death)?
Issue
- Whether an interest to take effect on death of the life tenant is vested or contingent.
Held
- The interest is vested from the date of transfer. Death is certain; only enjoyment is postponed. B's heirs inherit the vested remainder.
Ratio Decidendi
S.19 applies: the interest takes effect "on the happening of an event which must happen" (death). This creates vesting immediately. The remainderman's death before the life tenant does not destroy the interest: it passes to heirs.
How to use it in an exam
Cite for S.19 vested interest problems. Key line: "Postponement of enjoyment to the death of the life tenant does not make the interest contingent."
Source
Source: AIR 1942 Allahabad 90
This is an educational summary, not the judgment itself. Cite the reported version in professional or academic work.
Cited in study notes
Vested Interest and Contingent InterestVested remainder; death is certain event