Biswanath Prasad Radhey Shyam v Hindustan Metal Industries
AIR 1979 Supreme Court 144419791 min read
The case in brief30-second read
- Facts
- Respondent held a patent for a brass pitcher with a specific shape and process. Appellant manufactured similar pitchers and was sued for infringement. Appellant challenged validity on grounds of lack of inventive step.
- Issue
- What constitutes an inventive step for a valid patent
- Held
- A patent must disclose something not obvious to a person skilled in the art.
- Principle
- Workshop improvement obvious to person skilled in art lacks inventive step; routine trade variation not patentable
Facts
- Respondent held a patent for a brass pitcher with a specific shape and process
- Appellant manufactured similar pitchers and was sued for infringement
- Appellant challenged validity on grounds of lack of inventive step
- Evidence showed similar pitchers were manufactured by craftsmen before the patent date
- Expert evidence was led on obviousness
Issues
- What constitutes an inventive step for a valid patent
- Whether a workshop improvement satisfies the inventive step requirement
Held
- A patent must disclose something not obvious to a person skilled in the art
- A workshop improvement (routine variation by a skilled craftsman) is not patentable
- Patent revoked for want of subject matter
- Test: would a skilled person, knowing the prior art, consider the step obvious?
Ratio decidendi
The inventive step is the dividing line between invention and craftsmanship. Prior art includes all publicly available knowledge. If the variation is what any competent worker would produce routinely, there is no invention.
Exam use
How to use it in an answer
- Definitive Indian authority on inventive step and obviousness
- Cite in patent questions on novelty, subject matter, and revocation
- Pair with Novartis (2013) for the pharmaceutical S.3(d) threshold
Cite this
Citation
Biswanath Prasad Radhey Shyam v. Hindustan Metal Industries AIR 1979 Supreme Court 1444Reported: AIR Online. This is an educational summary, not the judgment itself. Cite the reported version in professional or academic work.