D.S. Nakara v Union of India

• Government pension scheme was amended to provide enhanced benefits
• Benefits were limited to employees retiring after a specific cut-off date
• Pensioners who retired before the cut-off were excluded from enhanced benefits despite being in the same class (government pensioners)
• Earlier retirees challenged the date-based exclusion as arbitrary discrimination under Article 14

1. Whether a beneficial welfare scheme can be interpreted to exclude persons within the protected class through an arbitrary cut-off date having no rational nexus to the scheme's purpose.

• A welfare statute is designed to benefit an entire class; dividing that class by an arbitrary date violates Article 14
• The pension scheme exists to provide social security to all retirees
• The date of retirement has no rational connection to the need for enhanced pension
• The arbitrary date-based exclusion is unconstitutional
• Enhanced pension benefits apply to all pensioners, not just those retiring after the cut-off

Beneficial construction operates alongside constitutional equality. A welfare statute cannot be read to arbitrarily exclude from its protection persons clearly within the class it was designed to benefit. Article 14 combined with beneficial construction demands maximum inclusion of all persons within the legislative intent.