Marfani & Co v. Midland Bank

[1968] 1 Weekly Law Reports 956Court of Appeal (England)1968Law of Banking and Negotiable Instruments
collecting-bankernegligenceS131conversion

Rule established

Collecting company cheque into employee's personal account without inquiry constitutes negligence; S.131 protection lost

Facts

  • A clerk employed by Marfani & Co received cheques payable to the company
  • The clerk opened a personal account at Midland Bank and deposited the company cheques
  • Midland Bank collected the proceeds without questioning why company cheques were going into a personal account
  • Marfani & Co discovered the fraud and sued Midland Bank for conversion

Issue

  1. Whether a collecting banker is negligent under S.131 (equivalent) when it collects cheques payable to a company into an employee's personal account without inquiry.

Held

  • The bank was negligent. A reasonable banker would inquire when cheques payable to a corporate entity are deposited into the personal account of an individual. The discrepancy between corporate payee and personal account is a red flag that demands inquiry. The bank's failure to inquire constituted negligence, destroying statutory protection. The bank was liable for conversion.

Ratio Decidendi

Collecting a cheque payable to a company into an individual's personal account without inquiry constitutes negligence on the part of the collecting banker. S.131 protection is lost. The bank is liable for conversion to the true owner.

How to use it in an exam

Key authority for negligence under S.131. Key line: "Company cheque into personal account without inquiry = negligent; S.131 protection lost." Essential for exam scenarios involving employee fraud.

Source

Source: Weekly Law Reports

This is an educational summary, not the judgment itself. Cite the reported version in professional or academic work.

Cited in study notes

Statutory Protection to Collecting BankerWhat constitutes negligence under S.131