Nervous shockSecondary victimHouse of Lords (UK)

McLoughlin v O'Brian

[1983] 1 Appeal Cases 41019831 min read
The case in brief30-second read
Facts
The plaintiff's husband and children were involved in a serious road accident. She was not present at the accident itself but was informed and travelled to the hospital shortly afterward. She witnessed her family's injuries and the immediate aftermath at the hospital. She suffered severe nervous shock as a result and sued the party responsible for the accident.
Issue
What requirements must a secondary victim, one who suffers psychiatric injury from witnessing harm to another rather than being personally endangered, satisfy to recover in negligence.
Held
Secondary victims must establish close ties of love and affection with the primary victim. They must establish close physical and temporal proximity to the accident or its immediate aftermath. The psychiatric injury must result from directly perceiving the event or its immediate aftermath through the claimant's own unaided senses. On these facts, given her close relationship and direct witnessing of the immediate aftermath, recovery was permitted.
Principle
Secondary victims must establish close ties of love and affection with the primary victim, close physical and temporal proximity to the event or its immediate aftermath, and direct perception through their own senses.

Facts

  • The plaintiff's husband and children were involved in a serious road accident. She was not present at the accident itself but was informed and travelled to the hospital shortly afterward. She witnessed her family's injuries and the immediate aftermath at the hospital. She suffered severe nervous shock as a result and sued the party responsible for the accident.

Issue

  1. What requirements must a secondary victim, one who suffers psychiatric injury from witnessing harm to another rather than being personally endangered, satisfy to recover in negligence.

Held

  • Secondary victims must establish close ties of love and affection with the primary victim. They must establish close physical and temporal proximity to the accident or its immediate aftermath. The psychiatric injury must result from directly perceiving the event or its immediate aftermath through the claimant's own unaided senses. On these facts, given her close relationship and direct witnessing of the immediate aftermath, recovery was permitted.

Ratio decidendi

Recovery for secondary victims requires satisfying three specific proximity requirements: relationship, physical and temporal closeness to the event or its immediate aftermath, and direct sensory perception. These requirements confine liability to a genuinely closely connected class of claimants.

Exam use

How to use it in an answer

  • Key line: "In McLoughlin v O'Brian (1983), the House of Lords established the three proximity requirements for secondary victim recovery: relationship, physical and temporal proximity, and direct perception."
  • Pair with Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police (1992) to show the demanding, fact-specific application of these requirements.

Cite this

Citation

McLoughlin v. O'Brian [1983] 1 Appeal Cases 410

Reported: [1983] 1 AC 410. This is an educational summary, not the judgment itself. Cite the reported version in professional or academic work.