N.R. Dongre v. Whirlpool Corporation
Rule established
Transborder reputation/goodwill of a foreign trademark is protectable in India even without use or registration in India. A mark that has acquired reputation through international media, advertising spillover, and foreign sales is entitled to passing off protection in India.
Facts
- Whirlpool Corporation (USA) owned the "Whirlpool" mark globally
- N.R. Dongre obtained registration of "Whirlpool" in India (1986)
- Dongre manufactured washing machines under the mark in India
- Whirlpool had not sold products in India but had reputation through international media
- Whirlpool sought injunction and cancellation of Dongre's registration
Issue
- Whether a foreign trademark owner without use or sales in India can maintain a passing off action based on transborder reputation.
Held
- Goodwill and reputation are not confined by territorial boundaries
- Whirlpool's reputation had crossed into India through media, international travel, and advertising
- Dongre's adoption of the mark was not honest concurrent use but an attempt to trade on Whirlpool's reputation
- Passing off action maintainable; injunction granted
Ratio Decidendi
Transborder reputation of a foreign mark is protectable in India through a passing off action. Where a mark has acquired international reputation that has penetrated into India through advertising spillover, media, or travel, the foreign owner can restrain an Indian party from using the mark even without local registration or sales.
How to use it in an exam
- Leading authority on transborder reputation
- Bridges passing off with international trademark protection
- Key line: "In N.R. Dongre v. Whirlpool (1996), the Supreme Court held that transborder reputation of a foreign mark is protectable in India through passing off, even without registration or sales in India."
Source
Source: 1996 (16) PTC 583 (SC)
This is an educational summary, not the judgment itself. Cite the reported version in professional or academic work.