Pratap Singh v State of Jharkhand

• Pratap Singh was accused of an offence committed when he was a minor.
• He was apprehended after turning 18.
• The question arose whether the JJ Act benefits applied based on age at commission or at apprehension/trial.
• Conflicting decisions from High Courts necessitated Constitution Bench reference.

1. What is the relevant date for determining whether an accused is a juvenile: date of commission of offence or date of production before court?

• The relevant date is the date of commission of the offence.
• If the accused was below 18 on the date of commission, they are entitled to JJ Act benefits regardless of age at trial.
• This applies even if the accused is apprehended years later as an adult.
• Age at the time of trial is irrelevant; the law applicable on the date of commission governs.
• This principle is now codified in S.2(13) JJ Act, 2015.

The purpose of the JJ Act is to protect children from the rigors of adult criminal justice. A person who was a child when the offence was committed should not lose protection merely because the State took time to apprehend them. The offender's mental state and maturity at the time of the act is what matters, not their subsequent development.