Supreme Court of India

Saleem Bhai v State of Maharashtra

(2003) 1 SCC 55720031 min read
The case in brief30-second read
Facts
The defendants applied under O.VII R.11 for rejection of the plaint. The trial court directed them to file their written statement first, and the High Court upheld that order.
Issue
Whether the court may decline to decide an O.VII R.11 application until the written statement is filed.
Held
For deciding an application under O.VII R.11(a) and (d), only the averments in the plaint are relevant. The pleas in the written statement are irrelevant. The power can be exercised at any stage of the suit, before registering the plaint, after summons, or before the end of the trial, so the direction to file the written statement first was wrong.
Principle
An O.VII R.11 application is decided on the averments in the plaint alone; the written statement is irrelevant.
Cite this

Facts

  • The defendants applied under O.VII R.11 for rejection of the plaint. The trial court directed them to file their written statement first, and the High Court upheld that order.

Issue

  1. Whether the court may decline to decide an O.VII R.11 application until the written statement is filed.

Held

  • For deciding an application under O.VII R.11(a) and (d), only the averments in the plaint are relevant. The pleas in the written statement are irrelevant. The power can be exercised at any stage of the suit, before registering the plaint, after summons, or before the end of the trial, so the direction to file the written statement first was wrong.

Ratio decidendi

For an application under O.VII R.11(a) and (d), only the averments in the plaint are relevant; the pleas in the written statement are irrelevant. The power can be exercised at any stage of the suit, so the court need not wait for the written statement before deciding the application.

Exam use

How to use it in an answer

  • Rejection of plaint: Cite for the material the court may look at under O.VII R.11.
  • Timing: The application can be decided before the written statement is filed.
  • Key line for exam: "In Saleem Bhai v State of Maharashtra, the Supreme Court held that an O.VII R.11 application is decided on the averments in the plaint alone."

Cite this

Citation

Saleem Bhai v State of Maharashtra (2003) 1 SCC 557

Reported: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/661632/. This is an educational summary, not the judgment itself. Cite the reported version in professional or academic work.