Death penaltyMercy petitionSupreme Court of India

Shatrughan Chauhan v Union of India

(2014) 3 Supreme Court Cases 120141 min read
The case in brief30-second read
Facts
Multiple death row convicts filed petitions challenging delay in disposal of their mercy petitions. Delays ranged from 3 to 12 years after exhaustion of judicial remedies.
Issue
Whether unexplained inordinate delay in disposing mercy petitions constitutes ground for commutation of death sentence.
Held
Inordinate delay in disposal of mercy petition is a supervening circumstance warranting commutation.
Principle
Inordinate delay in disposal of mercy petition violates Art. 21 and constitutes ground for commutation of death sentence to life imprisonment.

Facts

  • Multiple death row convicts filed petitions challenging delay in disposal of their mercy petitions.
  • Delays ranged from 3 to 12 years after exhaustion of judicial remedies.
  • Convicts argued prolonged mental suffering on death row violates Art. 21.
  • Union argued mercy power is executive prerogative with no time limit.

Issue

  1. Whether unexplained inordinate delay in disposing mercy petitions constitutes ground for commutation of death sentence.

Held

  • Inordinate delay in disposal of mercy petition is a supervening circumstance warranting commutation.
  • Death row prisoners retain Art. 21 rights; prolonged mental agony amounts to cruel and unusual treatment.
  • The State must explain any delay; unexplained delay entitles commutation.
  • Delay must be assessed from the date of filing mercy petition to the date of its disposal.
  • Commuted 15 death sentences to life imprisonment due to delays ranging from 3 to 12 years.

Ratio decidendi

The right to life under Art. 21 extends to death row prisoners. While awaiting execution, prolonged uncertainty inflicts mental torture equivalent to a second punishment beyond what the law prescribed. The State cannot hold the power of life and death indefinitely without accountability. BNSS S.472 responds legislatively by prescribing 30-day (Governor) and 60-day (President) timelines.

Exam use

How to use it in an answer

  • Part A (6 marks): Cite for: "Delay in mercy petition = ground for commutation." Direct link to S.472 BNSS.
  • Part B (15 marks): Use for: (a) S.472 BNSS timeline rationale, (b) post-conviction rights under Art. 21, (c) executive vs judicial power in sentencing.
  • Key line for exam: "Inordinate delay in disposal of mercy petition is a supervening circumstance warranting commutation of death sentence."

Cite this

Citation

Shatrughan Chauhan v. Union of India (2014) 3 Supreme Court Cases 1

Reported: SCC. This is an educational summary, not the judgment itself. Cite the reported version in professional or academic work.