Shatrughan Chauhan v Union of India
(2014) 3 Supreme Court Cases 120141 min read
The case in brief30-second read
- Facts
- Multiple death row convicts filed petitions challenging delay in disposal of their mercy petitions. Delays ranged from 3 to 12 years after exhaustion of judicial remedies.
- Issue
- Whether unexplained inordinate delay in disposing mercy petitions constitutes ground for commutation of death sentence.
- Held
- Inordinate delay in disposal of mercy petition is a supervening circumstance warranting commutation.
- Principle
- Inordinate delay in disposal of mercy petition violates Art. 21 and constitutes ground for commutation of death sentence to life imprisonment.
Facts
- Multiple death row convicts filed petitions challenging delay in disposal of their mercy petitions.
- Delays ranged from 3 to 12 years after exhaustion of judicial remedies.
- Convicts argued prolonged mental suffering on death row violates Art. 21.
- Union argued mercy power is executive prerogative with no time limit.
Issue
- Whether unexplained inordinate delay in disposing mercy petitions constitutes ground for commutation of death sentence.
Held
- Inordinate delay in disposal of mercy petition is a supervening circumstance warranting commutation.
- Death row prisoners retain Art. 21 rights; prolonged mental agony amounts to cruel and unusual treatment.
- The State must explain any delay; unexplained delay entitles commutation.
- Delay must be assessed from the date of filing mercy petition to the date of its disposal.
- Commuted 15 death sentences to life imprisonment due to delays ranging from 3 to 12 years.
Ratio decidendi
The right to life under Art. 21 extends to death row prisoners. While awaiting execution, prolonged uncertainty inflicts mental torture equivalent to a second punishment beyond what the law prescribed. The State cannot hold the power of life and death indefinitely without accountability. BNSS S.472 responds legislatively by prescribing 30-day (Governor) and 60-day (President) timelines.
Exam use
How to use it in an answer
- Part A (6 marks): Cite for: "Delay in mercy petition = ground for commutation." Direct link to S.472 BNSS.
- Part B (15 marks): Use for: (a) S.472 BNSS timeline rationale, (b) post-conviction rights under Art. 21, (c) executive vs judicial power in sentencing.
- Key line for exam: "Inordinate delay in disposal of mercy petition is a supervening circumstance warranting commutation of death sentence."
Cite this
Citation
Shatrughan Chauhan v. Union of India (2014) 3 Supreme Court Cases 1Reported: SCC. This is an educational summary, not the judgment itself. Cite the reported version in professional or academic work.