TRF Limited v Energo Engineering Projects Limited

(2017) 8 Supreme Court Cases 377Supreme Court of India2017Alternate Dispute Resolution
ADRsection-12appointmentineligibility

Rule established

A person who is ineligible to be appointed as arbitrator under S.12(5) cannot nominate another person as arbitrator; the power to nominate is derivative

Facts

  • TRF Ltd. (employer) and Energo Engineering (contractor) had a contract with an arbitration clause
  • The clause empowered the Managing Director of TRF to appoint a sole arbitrator
  • Disputes arose; TRF's MD nominated a retired judge as the sole arbitrator
  • Energo objected: the MD is an employee/officer of TRF (a party); under S.12(5) read with the Seventh Schedule, the MD is ineligible to be an arbitrator
  • The question: if the MD is ineligible to BE the arbitrator, can he NOMINATE someone else?

Issue

  1. Whether a person who is disqualified from being appointed as an arbitrator under S.12(5) read with the Seventh Schedule can exercise the power to nominate another person as arbitrator.

Held

  • The Managing Director of a party is per se ineligible to be appointed as arbitrator under S.12(5) (employee of a party: Seventh Schedule).
  • If a person is ineligible to be appointed, they cannot nominate another person. The power to nominate is derived from the power to be appointed. Once the source (eligibility) is extinguished, the derivative (nomination power) also dies.
  • The nominated arbitrator's appointment is invalid; the court should appoint an independent arbitrator under S.11(6).

Ratio Decidendi

The power to nominate an arbitrator is derivative of the nominator's own eligibility. An ineligible person's nomination power stands extinguished. This prevents indirect circumvention of S.12(5) safeguards by allowing an interested party-employee to handpick a nominally independent arbitrator.

How to use it in an exam

  • Part A: State: per TRF Ltd., a person ineligible under S.12(5) cannot nominate an arbitrator. Nomination power is derivative.
  • Part B: Use with Perkins Eastman (2019) for answers on unilateral appointment clauses and independence of arbitral process. Show how these cases protect party equality (S.18).
  • Key line: "Once the arbitrator has become ineligible by operation of law, he cannot nominate another as an arbitrator."

Source

Source: Supreme Court judgment

This is an educational summary, not the judgment itself. Cite the reported version in professional or academic work.

Cited in study notes

ADRAppointment of ArbitratorIneligibility and nomination power: nomination power extinguished when nominator is ineligible