Workmen of Reptakos Brett & Co. v. Reptakos Brett & Co.

(1992) 1 Supreme Court Cases 290 / AIR 1992 Supreme Court 504Supreme Court of India1992Labour Law II
minimum-wagesixth-component15th-ILCchildren-education

Rule established

Minimum wage must include a sixth component (25% addition) for children's education, medical needs, and recreation beyond the four norms of the 15th Indian Labour Conference.

Facts

  • Workers of Reptakos Brett & Co. demanded revision of minimum wage
  • Argued the four norms fixed by the 15th Indian Labour Conference (1957) were inadequate:
  • 15th ILC norms: food, clothing, housing, fuel/lighting for a standard working-class family (3 consumption units)
  • Workers demanded inclusion of:
  • Children's education
  • Medical requirements

Issue

  1. Whether minimum wage fixation must include children's education, medical requirements, and recreation in addition to the 15th ILC's four basic norms.

Held

  • The 15th ILC norms are the floor, not the ceiling
  • Minimum wage must include a 25% addition (the "sixth component") over the four norms to cover:
  • Children's education
  • Medical needs
  • Minimum recreation and contingencies

Ratio Decidendi

Minimum wage must include a 25% addition over the 15th ILC's four norms (food, clothing, housing, fuel/lighting) to account for children's education, medical requirements, and minimum recreation. The 15th ILC norms represent bare subsistence and are not exhaustive.

How to use it in an exam

  • Authority for "25% addition" or "sixth component" in minimum wage computation
  • Always cite when asked about composition/components of minimum wage
  • The Hindu (2023): Karnataka government ordered to re-calculate minimum wages following Reptakos norms, showing the case remains binding
  • Key line: "The Supreme Court in Reptakos Brett (1992) held that minimum wage must include a 25% addition over the 15th ILC norms for children's education, medical needs, and recreation."

Source

Source: (1992) 1 SCC 290

This is an educational summary, not the judgment itself. Cite the reported version in professional or academic work.