Intellectual Property Law · Paper 405
The Exam Priority Guide
Decoded from 12 Osmania University question papers, 2016 to 2025.
12
Papers analysed
5
Units covered
12 hrs
Covers the paper
1. Where the Marks Live
Every unit, ranked by its real share of the paper.
| Unit | Focus | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Unit III | Copyright | 25% |
| Unit IV | Trademarks & Designs | 23% |
| Unit V | Patents | 22% |
| Unit I | Introduction to IP | 15% |
| Unit II | International Protection | 15% |
Copyright is the heaviest unit at 25%. Unlike other papers where 1-2 units dominate, IPL distributes fairly evenly — every paper tests all five forms of IP. No unit is ever skipped.
2. Part A: Short Note Questions (6 marks)
Answer any 5 of 8 · ranked by frequency across 12 papers.
Geographical Indications
Registration under GI Act 2003. Product linked to geographical origin. Darjeeling Tea, Basmati Rice. Community right, not individual.
Plant Varieties Protection
PPVFR Act 2001. Sui generis system. Farmers' rights. Distinct, uniform, stable. Not patentable under S.3(j) Patents Act.
Author's Special Rights / Moral Rights
S.57 Copyright Act. Right of paternity and integrity. Cannot be assigned. Survive transfer of economic rights.
Passing Off
Common law remedy. No registration needed. Goodwill + misrepresentation + damage. Reckitt & Colman v Borden (Jif Lemon).
Well-Known Trademarks
S.2(1)(zg) TM Act. Trans-border reputation. Protection beyond registered class. McDonald's, Coca-Cola.
Kinds of Patents
Product patent, process patent, improvement patent. Patent of addition. Convention patent. Section 5 history.
Compulsory Licensing
S.84 Patents Act. Not worked for 3 years. Reasonable requirements not satisfied. Natco v Bayer (Nexavar) 2012.
Copyright in Design
S.15 Copyright Act. Registered design — no copyright. Unregistered — copyright subsists. Overlap exclusion.
Right to Secrecy
S.35 Patents Act. Defence-related inventions. Controller may restrict publication. National security override.
Neighbouring Rights
Performers (S.38), broadcasters (S.37), sound recording producers. Related rights. Duration differs from copyright.
Computer Programmes
S.3(k) Patents Act: not patentable per se. S.2(o) Copyright Act: literary work. Dual protection limited.
Anton Pillar Order
Ex parte search order. Prevent destruction of evidence. Copyright/trademark infringement cases. English origin.
3. Part B: Essay Questions (15 marks)
Answer any 2 of 4 · the high-value essays.
Meaning, nature, classification of IP
Definition, justification theories (labour, personality, incentive), five main forms, distinction from tangible property.
Rights of Authors — economic + moral rights
S.14 economic (reproduction, adaptation, translation, communication). S.57 moral (paternity, integrity). Duration: life + 60.
Non-patentable inventions (S.3 Patents Act)
20 exclusions. S.3(d) evergreening. S.3(j) plants/animals. S.3(k) computer per se. S.3(p) traditional knowledge.
Infringement of Trademark vs Passing Off
S.29 infringement (registered mark). Passing off (unregistered, common law). Both need deceptive similarity. Different remedies.
Copyright Infringement + exceptions + remedy
S.51 infringement. S.52 exceptions (fair dealing, education, judicial). Civil + criminal remedies. Anton Pillar orders.
TRIPS Agreement (salient features + impact)
WTO 1994. Minimum standards. National treatment. MFN. Enforcement. Dispute settlement. Doha Declaration 2001 flexibilities.
Rights and duties of Patentee
S.48 exclusive rights. S.53 term (20 years). Working requirement. Compulsory licence risk. Surrender, revocation.
Paris Convention 1883
National treatment. Priority right (12 months patents, 6 months TM/designs). Independence of patents. 177 members.
Industrial Design (definition, rights, registration)
Designs Act 2000. S.2(d) shape/configuration/pattern. 15-year protection. Registration mandatory. No copyright overlap.
4. Part C: Problem Questions (10 marks)
Answer any 2 of 4 · the most recycled problems.
Trademark deceptive similarity / well-known mark infringement
S.29 TM Act. Deceptive similarity test (S.2(1)(h)). Visual, phonetic, structural comparison. Cadila v Cadila 2001.
Traditional knowledge / traditional medicine — can it be patented?
S.3(p) Patents Act. Prior art. No novelty. Turmeric case (USPTO revoked). Neem case (EPO revoked).
New plant variety / agricultural method — patent?
S.3(j) excludes plants/animals/seeds. PPVFR Act 2001 is proper route. Agricultural methods also excluded S.3(h).
Copyright fair use (teacher copies, school performance)
S.52 Copyright Act. Fair dealing for research/education. Private use. Judicial proceedings. News reporting.
Architectural design copied — copyright infringement?
S.2(c) artistic work includes architecture. Infringement if substantial part copied. No registration needed for copyright.
Computer software patent vs copyright
S.3(k): per se not patentable. Technical effect doctrine. Copyright under S.2(o). Dual protection limited.
Passing Off — unregistered mark + reputation
Common law. Three elements: goodwill, misrepresentation, damage. No registration needed. Reckitt & Colman test.
Geographical Indication — regional product
GI Act 2003. Community right. Registration protects origin-linked quality. Pembarti brassware, Pochampally Ikat.
5. Topics Due for Return
Long gaps since last appearance. These cycle back.
Industrial Design (Part B essay)
Was asked regularly before 2016. Longest gap in dataset.
Geographical Indications (Part B essay)
Regular rotation. Only asked in Part A recently.
Berne Convention (Part B essay)
Conventions rotate every 3-4 years. Overdue.
WIPO (Part A)
Growing relevance. Long gap.
Domain Names
Digital IP growing. Could return as problem.
6. The Study Plan: 12 Hours
Ten topic blocks. Every form of IP gets coverage.
| Priority | Topic | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Copyright (infringement + exceptions + fair use + ownership) | 2 hrs |
| 2 | Patents (S.3 non-patentable + rights/duties + compulsory licence) | 2 hrs |
| 3 | Trademarks (infringement vs passing off + deceptive similarity) | 1.5 hrs |
| 4 | Forms of IP (meaning, nature, classification) | 1 hr |
| 5 | TRIPS + International Conventions (Paris, Berne, PCT) | 1.5 hrs |
| 6 | Geographical Indications (+ regional product problems) | 1 hr |
| 7 | Plant Varieties / Traditional Knowledge (+ patent problems) | 1 hr |
| 8 | Industrial Designs (definition, rights, infringement) | 1 hr |
| 9 | Digital IP (computer programmes, domain names, webcasting) | 0.5 hrs |
| 10 | Authors' Rights (economic + moral + assignment) | 0.5 hrs |
7. Model Answers
Complete answers for Part A, B, and C. Free to download.
8. Predicted Paper 2026
Read this first. This is a pattern-based prediction built from 12 years of past papers. It is not a leaked paper and not a guarantee. Frequency is not certainty. Use it to prioritise revision, never as a substitute for full preparation.
FACULTY OF LAWLL.B. (3-YDC) IV-Semester Examination, 2026
Intellectual Property Law
Max. Marks: 80 · Time: 3 Hours
Intellectual Property Law
Max. Marks: 80 · Time: 3 Hours
PART A — Answer any FIVE (5 x 6 = 30)
- Geographical Indications
- Compulsory Licensing
- Passing Off
- Moral Rights of Authors
- Plant Varieties Protection
- Industrial Designs
- Anton Pillar Order
- WIPO
PART B — Answer any TWO (2 x 15 = 30)
- What is Intellectual Property? Discuss the meaning, nature, and classification of IP rights with examples.
- Discuss the rights of authors under the Copyright Act, 1957 — both economic and moral rights. How do they differ?
- Explain the inventions that are non-patentable under Section 3 of the Patents Act, 1970. Discuss with decided cases.
- What are the salient features of the Berne Convention, 1886? Discuss its impact on Indian copyright law.
PART C — Answer any TWO (2 x 10 = 20)
- X develops a new herbal formulation based on traditional Ayurvedic knowledge and applies for a patent. Can the patent be granted? Decide.
- A uses the mark “STAR HEALTH” for a hospital. B, who owns the registered trademark “STAR” for health services, sues for infringement. A claims the marks are different. Decide.
- A teacher photocopies an entire chapter from a textbook for distribution to her class. The publisher sues for copyright infringement. The teacher claims fair use. Decide.
- X develops a new variety of mango by cross-breeding. X applies for a patent. Can a patent be granted? What is the appropriate legal remedy?
More subjects, decoded the same way.
Follow @lawstories.in so you don't miss the next breakdown.
Built from 12 Osmania University papers (2016–2025) · lawstories.in
Frequency is a guide, not a guarantee. Verify case citations with your textbook.
Frequency is a guide, not a guarantee. Verify case citations with your textbook.