Ghanshyam Das v Dominion of India
AIR 1984 Supreme Court 100419841 min read
The case in brief30-second read
- Facts
- A question arose whether a particular court order constituted a "decree" for purposes of appeal and execution. The order had characteristics of both a decree and a procedural order.
- Issue
- What are the essential elements that distinguish a decree from an order under the CPC?
- Held
- Three conditions must be satisfied for a "decree" under S.2(2):
- Principle
- A decision to be a 'decree' under Section 2(2) CPC must satisfy three conditions: (1) it must be a formal expression, (2) it must be an adjudication, and (3) it must conclusively determine rights of parties. Administrative or ministerial orders of court do not qualify as decrees.
Facts
- A question arose whether a particular court order constituted a "decree" for purposes of appeal and execution
- The order had characteristics of both a decree and a procedural order
- The classification determined whether appeal lay under S.96 (decree) or Order 43 (order)
Issue
- What are the essential elements that distinguish a decree from an order under the CPC?
Held
- Three conditions must be satisfied for a "decree" under S.2(2):
- Formal expression, not informal or oral
- Adjudication: a judicial determination on merits, not administrative action
- Conclusive determination of rights of parties regarding matters in controversy
- Administrative or ministerial orders do not qualify even if made by a court
Ratio decidendi
A decree requires formal expression + adjudication + conclusive determination of rights. Administrative/ministerial orders fail the adjudication element and are not decrees.
Exam use
How to use it in an answer
- Key line: "In Ghanshyam Das (1984), the Supreme Court held that a decree under S.2(2) requires: (1) formal expression, (2) adjudication, and (3) conclusive determination of rights. Administrative orders of court are not decrees."
Cite this
Citation
Ghanshyam Das v. Dominion of India AIR 1984 Supreme Court 1004Reported: AIR 1984 SC 1004; verified via standard CPC references. This is an educational summary, not the judgment itself. Cite the reported version in professional or academic work.