Supreme Court of India

Satyadhyan Ghosal v Deorajin Debi

AIR 1960 SC 94119601 min read
The case in brief30-second read
Facts
In eviction proceedings, the tenant's plea for protection under a rent statute was rejected at an earlier stage by an order which the tenant challenged in revision without success. The question was raised again at a later stage in an appeal arising from the final order.
Issue
Whether res judicata applies between different stages of the same proceeding, and whether an unappealed interlocutory order can be challenged in appeal from the final decision.
Held
The principle of res judicata applies between two stages of the same litigation, so that a court deciding a matter at one stage cannot reopen it at a later stage of the same proceeding. But an interlocutory order which was not appealed against, whether because no appeal lay or because the party chose not to appeal, does not prevent the party from challenging it in an appeal from the final decree or order.
Principle
Res judicata operates between stages of the same proceeding, but an unappealed interlocutory order can be challenged in appeal from the final decision.
Cite this

Facts

  • In eviction proceedings, the tenant's plea for protection under a rent statute was rejected at an earlier stage by an order which the tenant challenged in revision without success. The question was raised again at a later stage in an appeal arising from the final order.

Issue

  1. Whether res judicata applies between different stages of the same proceeding, and whether an unappealed interlocutory order can be challenged in appeal from the final decision.

Held

  • The principle of res judicata applies between two stages of the same litigation, so that a court deciding a matter at one stage cannot reopen it at a later stage of the same proceeding. But an interlocutory order which was not appealed against, whether because no appeal lay or because the party chose not to appeal, does not prevent the party from challenging it in an appeal from the final decree or order.

Ratio decidendi

Res judicata applies between two stages of the same litigation, so a matter decided at one stage cannot be reopened at a later stage in the same court. But an interlocutory order that was not appealed against, because no appeal lay or none was filed, may still be challenged in an appeal from the final decree or order.

Exam use

How to use it in an answer

  • Part A (6 marks): Cite for res judicata between stages of the same proceeding and its limit for unappealed interlocutory orders.
  • Part B (15 marks): Use in an answer on S.11 CPC to cover special situations, alongside Iftikhar Ahmed v Syed Meharban Ali (co-defendants) and Mathura Prasad Bajoo Jaiswal v Dossibai (pure questions of law).

Cite this

Citation

Satyadhyan Ghosal v Deorajin Debi AIR 1960 SC 941

Reported: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/655045/. This is an educational summary, not the judgment itself. Cite the reported version in professional or academic work.