Kalyanasundaram v. Kalavathi

AIR 2007 Supreme Court 1285Supreme Court of India2007Property Law
property-lawTPAsection-123gift

Rule established

Gift of immovable property without a registered instrument is void under S.123; no title passes regardless of delivery of possession

Facts

  • A donor executed an unregistered document purporting to gift immovable property
  • The donee took possession and enjoyed the property for several years
  • The donor's heirs challenged the gift as void for want of registration

Issue

  1. Whether a gift of immovable property can be completed without a registered instrument, based solely on delivery of possession and the parties' intention.

Held

  • The gift is void. S.123 mandates that for immovable property, the transfer by way of gift must be effected by a registered instrument signed by the donor and attested by at least two witnesses. Without registration, no title passes. Delivery of possession alone cannot substitute for the statutory requirement.

Ratio Decidendi

S.123 is mandatory, not directory. The word "shall" indicates a compulsory requirement. Unlike sale (where property below Rs.100 can be transferred orally), gifts of immovable property always require a registered instrument. This protects against fraudulent claims of oral gifts.

How to use it in an exam

Use whenever a gift problem involves unregistered transfer. Key line: "No title passes through an unregistered gift of immovable property; S.123 is mandatory."

Source

Source: (2007) 2 SCC 490

This is an educational summary, not the judgment itself. Cite the reported version in professional or academic work.