Smt. Vidya v. Smt. Parmila

AIR 2007 P&H 132Punjab and Haryana High Court2007Property Law
property-lawTPAsection-122gift

Rule established

Acceptance of a gift can be implied from conduct such as taking possession, making improvements, and asserting ownership

Facts

  • A gift deed was registered in favor of the donee
  • The donee took possession and lived in the property for years
  • The donee never signed a separate "acceptance" document
  • The donor's heirs challenged the gift claiming absence of formal acceptance

Issue

  1. Whether acceptance of a gift requires a separate written or express declaration, or can it be implied from conduct.

Held

  • Acceptance can be implied. Taking possession of gifted property and exercising ownership rights (living in it, making improvements, paying taxes, asserting title) constitutes implied acceptance. A separate document of acceptance is not required.

Ratio Decidendi

S.122 requires acceptance but does not prescribe the form of acceptance. Acceptance may be express (written/oral declaration) or implied (conduct inconsistent with non-acceptance). The key test is whether the donee's actions demonstrate an intention to accept the gift.

How to use it in an exam

Use in problems where donee does not formally accept but exercises ownership. Key line: "Taking possession + exercising ownership = implied acceptance of gift."

Source

Source: Avatar Singh, Law of Transfer of Property

This is an educational summary, not the judgment itself. Cite the reported version in professional or academic work.