Paying bankerCustomer dutyHouse of Lords (England)

London Joint Stock Bank v Macmillan & Arthur

[1918] Appeal Cases 77719181 min read
The case in brief30-second read
Facts
A clerk of Macmillan & Arthur was authorised to fill in cheques for small amounts. The clerk drew a cheque for "2 pounds" (in figures: "2-0-0") leaving blank space before the figure.
Issue
Whether a customer who draws a cheque negligently (leaving spaces facilitating alteration) can recover from the bank when the bank pays the altered amount.
Held
The House of Lords held that the customer owed an implied contractual duty to the bank to exercise reasonable care in drawing cheques so as not to facilitate fraud. Macmillan & Arthur drew the cheque negligently by leaving spaces that enabled the alteration. The customer's breach of duty caused the loss. The bank was not liable; the customer bore the loss of the excess amount.
Principle
Customer owes implied duty to draw cheques with reasonable care (Macmillan duty); negligent drawing shifts loss to customer

Facts

  • A clerk of Macmillan & Arthur was authorised to fill in cheques for small amounts
  • The clerk drew a cheque for "2 pounds" (in figures: "2-0-0") leaving blank space before the figure
  • The clerk then fraudulently altered the figure to "120-0-0" (one hundred and twenty pounds) by inserting "1" and "0" in the spaces
  • The bank paid 120 pounds
  • Macmillan & Arthur sued the bank to recover the excess (118 pounds)

Issue

  1. Whether a customer who draws a cheque negligently (leaving spaces facilitating alteration) can recover from the bank when the bank pays the altered amount.

Held

  • The House of Lords held that the customer owed an implied contractual duty to the bank to exercise reasonable care in drawing cheques so as not to facilitate fraud. Macmillan & Arthur drew the cheque negligently by leaving spaces that enabled the alteration. The customer's breach of duty caused the loss. The bank was not liable; the customer bore the loss of the excess amount.

Ratio decidendi

The customer owes an implied duty to the bank to draw cheques with reasonable care. If the customer's negligence in drawing the cheque facilitates alteration, the customer (not the bank) bears the resulting loss. This is the "Macmillan duty."

Exam use

How to use it in an answer

Foundational for S.89 (materially altered instruments) and customer-banker duties. Key line: "Customer must draw cheques carefully; negligent drawing that facilitates alteration shifts loss from bank to customer."

Cite this

Citation

London Joint Stock Bank v. Macmillan & Arthur [1918] Appeal Cases 777

Reported: Appeal Cases. This is an educational summary, not the judgment itself. Cite the reported version in professional or academic work.