Rule
An easement is a right which the owner or occupier of certain land has, for the beneficial enjoyment of that land, to do and continue to do something, or to prevent and continue to prevent something being done, in or upon or in respect of certain other land not his own (S.4, Easements Act).
- The land that benefits is the dominant heritage. Its owner is the dominant owner.
- The land that bears the burden is the servient heritage. Its owner is the servient owner.
- An easement goes with the dominant heritage. It cannot be transferred apart from it (S.6(c), TPA; S.19, Easements Act).
Land is often useful only with some help from a neighbour's land: a way to the road, light through a window, a drain. Easements let that help become a lasting right attached to the land, not a favour that ends with a change of owner.
| Provision | What it says |
|---|---|
| S.4 | Definition of easement, dominant and servient heritage |
| S.5 | Kinds: continuous or discontinuous, apparent or non-apparent |
| S.8, S.12 | Who may impose and who may acquire an easement |
| S.13 | Easements of necessity and quasi-easements |
| S.15 | Acquisition by prescription |
| S.18 | Customary easements |
| S.19 | Easement passes with the dominant heritage |
| S.37 to S.48 | Ways an easement is extinguished |
| S.49 to S.51 | Suspension and revival |
| S.52 | Licence defined |
The flowchart shows the structure and the ways an easement is acquired.
Diagram as text
flowchart LR
E(["Easement (S.4 Easements Act)"])
E --> D["Dominant heritage<br/>(benefited land)"]
E --> S["Servient heritage<br/>(burdened land)"]
E --> ES["Essentials: two tenements,<br/>different owners, benefit<br/>to the dominant land"]
E --> AC["Acquisition"]
AC --> AC1["Necessity / quasi-easement (S.13)"]
AC --> AC2["Express grant (S.8, S.12)"]
AC --> AC3["Prescription: 20 yrs (S.15)"]
AC --> AC4["Custom (S.18)"]Requirements
| # | Requirement | What to check |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | A dominant and a servient heritage | Two separate pieces of land |
| 2 | Different owners | No one has an easement over his own land |
| 3 | For the beneficial enjoyment of the dominant land | Not a mere personal benefit to its owner |
| 4 | A right to do, or to prevent, something | On or in respect of the servient land |
| 5 | Over land not the dominant owner's own | The right is over another's land |
| 6 | Certain and capable of being granted | The right is defined, not vague |
Kinds of easement
| Kind | Meaning | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Positive | Right to do something on the servient land | Right of way, right to draw water |
| Negative | Right to stop the servient owner doing something | Right to light or air |
| Continuous (S.5) | Enjoyed without any act of man | Light, support |
| Discontinuous (S.5) | Needs an act of man each time | Right of way |
| Apparent (S.5) | Shown by a sign that a careful inspection would reveal | A visible drain or path |
| Non-apparent (S.5) | No such sign | Right to prevent building above a height |
| Of necessity (S.13) | Without it the land cannot be used at all | Only access to a landlocked plot |
| Quasi-easement (S.13) | Use of one part of one's land for another part, which becomes an easement when the parts are split | Drain from one house through the other |
Acquisition
| Mode | Section | Key point |
|---|---|---|
| Express grant | S.8, S.12 | By the owner, by deed. Registration if the law requires |
| Necessity and quasi-easement | S.13 | Arises on transfer, bequest or partition of land |
| Prescription | S.15 | 20 years, 30 against the Government |
| Custom | S.18 | Local custom |
Prescription under S.15
- Light or air to a building, and support: peaceable enjoyment, without interruption, for 20 years.
- A right of way and other easements: peaceable and open enjoyment, as an easement and as of right, without interruption, for 20 years.
- The 20 years must end within 2 years before the suit.
- An interruption counts only if the claimant submits to it or acquiesces in it for one year after he knows of it and of who caused it.
- The Latin test is nec vi, nec clam, nec precario: not by force, not in secret, not by permission.
Extinction, suspension and revival
| Mode | Section |
|---|---|
| Dissolution of the servient owner's right | S.37 |
| Release by the dominant owner, express or implied (including discontinuance) | S.38 |
| Revocation under a reserved power | S.39 |
| Expiry of a limited period or happening of a dissolving condition | S.40 |
| End of the necessity, for an easement of necessity | S.41 |
| Easement becomes useless | S.42 |
| Permanent change in the dominant heritage | S.43 |
| Permanent alteration of the servient heritage by superior force | S.44 |
| Permanent destruction of either heritage | S.45 |
| Unity of ownership of both heritages | S.46 |
| Non-enjoyment for 20 years | S.47 |
| Suspension and revival | S.49 to S.51 |
Illustrations
1. Right of way by prescription
- Facts: For 25 years Ravi has walked openly through Suresh's compound to reach the road, without asking leave. Suresh now builds a wall across the path.
- Result: Ravi can claim a prescriptive right of way (S.15) if he sues within 2 years of the 20 years ending.
- Why: Open and peaceable use as of right for 20 years ripens into an easement.
2. Right to light
- Facts: Anita's windows have taken light across Bharat's open plot for 22 years. Bharat plans a 5-storey block that will shut out the light.
- Result: Anita has an easement of light (S.15). She can stop a building that materially reduces it.
- Why: Light to a building enjoyed peaceably for 20 years without interruption is a prescriptive right.
3. Use by permission
- Facts: Ravi uses the path only because Suresh wrote: "You may use my path until I need it."
- Result: No easement, however long the use.
- Why: Use by permission is not use as of right (nec precario: not by leave).
4. Easement of necessity
- Facts: A sells the front half of his plot, which faces the road, to B. The back half he keeps has no other access.
- Result: A has a right of way over the front half (S.13).
- Why: An easement of necessity arises on the transfer itself. No period of use is needed.
5. Personal benefit only
- Facts: B lets A park his car on B's land as a favour.
- Result: Not an easement. It is a licence.
- Why: The benefit is to A personally, not to any dominant land.
6. Merger
- Facts: A has a right of way over B's land and then buys B's land.
- Result: The easement ends by unity of ownership (S.46).
- Why: No one can have an easement over his own land.
Key Cases
Hero Vinoth v Seshammal, (2006) 5 SCC 545
- Facts: The appellant claimed a right of way over the respondent's land as an easement of necessity and by prescription.
- Held: An easement of necessity needs absolute necessity, not mere convenience. Prescription needs proof of use as of right for the full period.
- Principle: Courts apply the S.13 and S.15 conditions strictly.
Mere convenience does not create an easement of necessity. If there is any other access, even a longer one, there is no necessity.
Distinctions
| Basis | Easement | Licence (S.52) |
|---|---|---|
| Nature | Right attached to land | Personal permission, no interest in land |
| Transfer | Goes with the dominant heritage (S.19) | Cannot be transferred (S.56) |
| Revocation | Not revocable at will | Revocable, except in the cases in S.60 |
| Binds | Successors of the servient owner | Not the licensor's transferee (S.59) |
| Example | Right of way by prescription | Leave to park in a neighbour's drive |
| Basis | Easement | Lease |
|---|---|---|
| What passes | A limited right of use | Right to possess and enjoy |
| Possession | Stays with the servient owner | Passes to the lessee |
| Payment | Not needed | Rent or premium |
| Attached to land | Yes, to the dominant heritage | No |
Exam Scenario
A divides his land into Plot X, facing the road, and Plot Y, behind it with no road access. He sells Plot X to B and keeps Plot Y. For 5 years A uses a path across Plot X. B then builds a wall across it, saying A has not used it for 20 years. Advise A.
Approach
- Issue: The claim is an easement of necessity (S.13), not prescription (S.15).
- Met: The land was divided by a transfer from A to B.
- Met: Plot Y has no other access, so the right is absolutely necessary.
- Not met (for B): The 20-year period is irrelevant. It applies only to prescription.
Conclusion: A has an easement of necessity over Plot X.
Remedy: A can sue for a mandatory injunction to remove the wall. The easement lasts while the necessity lasts (S.41).
Scenario 2
Shankar has used a footpath across Ravi's field openly for 23 years. Ten years ago Ravi told him, "I don't mind you using the path, you may continue." Last month Ravi fenced it off. Advise Shankar.
Approach
- Met: Open and peaceable use for 23 years.
- Issue: Was the use as of right? Ravi's words may turn the last 10 years into use by permission if Shankar accepted the leave.
- Not met, if he did: The 20 years must end within 2 years before the suit, and the most recent 10 years would then be by permission.
- Issue: If Ravi's words were mere tolerance and Shankar went on claiming as of right, the use stays as of right.
Conclusion: Shankar's claim turns on the effect of Ravi's statement. If it made the later use permissive, the claim fails.
Remedy: If the claim succeeds, a mandatory injunction to remove the fence.
Scenario 3
A has a prescriptive right of way over B's land. He moves away and does not use it for 18 years, then uses it again for 3 years. B blocks it, saying the right is extinguished. Advise.
Approach
- Not met: Non-enjoyment for 20 continuous years (S.47). The break was only 18 years.
Conclusion: The easement was not extinguished.
Remedy: A can sue for removal of the obstruction.
Recall Check
- What are the essentials of an easement under S.4?
- What are the conditions of a prescriptive easement under S.15?
- How does an easement of necessity differ from one by grant?
- Name four ways an easement is extinguished.
Flashcards
How does S.4 define an easement?
A right which the owner or occupier of certain land has, for the beneficial enjoyment of that land, to do or prevent something in or upon, or in respect of, certain other land not his own.
What are dominant and servient tenements?
Dominant heritage: land benefited by the easement. Servient heritage: land burdened by it.
What are the requirements for prescriptive easement (S.15)?
20 years' peaceable enjoyment without interruption (and, for a way or similar right, openly and as of right), ending within 2 years before the suit. 30 years against the Government.
Can permissive use ripen into prescription?
No. Use by permission is not use as of right, however long it lasts.
What is an easement of necessity?
An easement that arises on a transfer, bequest or partition when one part cannot be used at all without a right over the other (S.13). No period of use is needed. It ends when the necessity ends (S.41).
Does an easement pass to the successor of the dominant land?
Yes. A transfer of the dominant heritage passes the easement to the transferee (S.19).
Define "easement" under S.4.
A right which the owner or occupier of certain land possesses for the beneficial enjoyment of that land, to do or prevent something on certain other land not his own.
What is the "dominant heritage"?
The land for whose beneficial enjoyment the easement exists.
What is the "servient heritage"?
The land over which the easement is exercised.
What is a positive easement?
A right to do something on the servient land, such as a right of way or to draw water.
What is a negative easement?
A right to prevent the servient owner from doing something, such as blocking light or air.
Can an easement exist over one's own land?
No. The dominant and servient heritages must belong to different owners. Unity of ownership extinguishes an easement (S.46).
Is an easement transferable apart from the dominant heritage?
No. S.6(c) TPA: an easement cannot be transferred apart from the dominant heritage.
What are the four modes of acquiring an easement?
- (1) Express grant (S.8, S.12) - (2) Necessity or quasi-easement on transfer or partition (S.13) - (3) Prescription (S.15) - (4) Custom (S.18)
What is the prescriptive period under S.15 against a private person?
20 years of peaceable enjoyment without interruption (openly and as of right for a way and similar rights).
What do "nec vi, nec clam, nec precario" mean?
nec vi, nec clam, nec precario: not by force, not in secret, not by permission.
What constitutes "interruption" sufficient to break prescription?
An actual obstruction that the claimant submits to or acquiesces in for one year after he knows of it and of who caused it (S.15, Explanation II).
Can permissive use ripen into a prescriptive easement?
No. Use as of right means use without permission. Permissive use never creates prescription.
Name five modes of extinction of easements.
- (1) Release (S.38) - (2) End of necessity (S.41) - (3) Permanent destruction of either heritage (S.45) - (4) Unity of ownership (S.46) - (5) Non-enjoyment for 20 years (S.47)
What is extinction by merger?
When the same person becomes owner of both the dominant and servient heritages in the same right, the easement is extinguished (S.46).
Does an easement revive automatically when merged properties are later separated?
Generally no. It revives only in the cases in S.51, for example where the unity of ownership is set aside by a decree.
What is the period of non-enjoyment required for extinction under S.47?
Extinction by non-enjoyment is under S.47, not S.44. It needs 20 continuous years of non-enjoyment. S.44 is permanent alteration of the servient heritage by superior force.
What is the difference between suspension and extinction?
Suspension is temporary, and the easement revives when the cause ends (S.49, S.51). Extinction ends it, and it must be created afresh.