Navin Chandra v Smt. Kesharbai
AIR 1996 Madhya Pradesh 119961 min read
The case in brief30-second read
- Facts
- A gift deed was executed transferring property to the donee with a condition that the donee "shall never sell, mortgage, or alienate the property to anyone" The donee subsequently mortgaged the property.
- Issue
- Whether a condition in a gift deed absolutely prohibiting the donee from alienating the property is enforceable.
- Held
- The condition is void under S.10 TPA. Any condition absolutely restraining the transferee from parting with or disposing of their interest in property is void. The donee takes the property free of the restraint and can deal with it as absolute owner.
- Principle
- A condition absolutely restraining alienation attached to a gift deed is void under S.10 TPA; donee takes property free of restraint
Facts
- A gift deed was executed transferring property to the donee with a condition that the donee "shall never sell, mortgage, or alienate the property to anyone"
- The donee subsequently mortgaged the property
- The donor's heirs challenged the mortgage, relying on the restraint clause in the gift deed
Issue
- Whether a condition in a gift deed absolutely prohibiting the donee from alienating the property is enforceable.
Held
- The condition is void under S.10 TPA. Any condition absolutely restraining the transferee from parting with or disposing of their interest in property is void. The donee takes the property free of the restraint and can deal with it as absolute owner.
Ratio decidendi
S.10 TPA strikes down conditions that absolutely restrain alienation because they conflict with the very concept of ownership. Once property is transferred, the transferee becomes owner with all incidents of ownership, including the right to alienate. An absolute bar on alienation is repugnant to the nature of the estate transferred.
Exam use
How to use it in an answer
Use when discussing S.10 (condition restraining alienation) or validity of conditions in gift deeds. Key line: "An absolute restraint on alienation is void; the transferee takes property free of such restriction."
Cite this
Citation
Navin Chandra v. Smt. Kesharbai AIR 1996 Madhya Pradesh 1Reported: Avatar Singh, Law of Transfer of Property. This is an educational summary, not the judgment itself. Cite the reported version in professional or academic work.